Knight Capital heads into make-or-break weekend  Stock Market  Predictions
(Global  Markets) - Knight Capital Group Inc's future remained in flux as it  headed into the weekend trying to clinch a rescue deal, but there was  skepticism on Wall Street that one of the largest U.S. equities trading  firms would find a suitor before Monday.
  
Knight was plunged into crisis on Wednesday  when it lost $440 million, most of its capital, after a software glitch  caused it to make thousands of unintended trades on about 140  stocks.
Knight said on Thursday it  was actively pursuing strategic and financing alternatives.
Early on Friday unconfirmed reports that the  company had received a line of credit led to a partial recovery in its  stock price and helped persuade some major clients to resume trading  with the firm.
At least one private  equity firm, TA Associates, signed a non-disclosure agreement with the  firm, a signal that it was looking at Knight's books for a potential  acquisition or investment. TA Associates was not immediately available  for comment. Knight did not respond to calls on Friday.
Sources familiar with the plans of some  other private equity firms said they would be looking at Knight as  well.
But sources at some other  U.S. private equity firms that are active in the financial services  sector said they had been approached by Knight's advisers Sandler  O'Neill but decided not to pursue a deal with the firm.
"To go in fast and take a lot of risk -  usually you do that when the terms and the price are safe," said a  senior private equity executive whose firm was approached but decided  not to pursue Knight.
One  difficulty for bidders would be estimating the size of potential legal  liability that the company could face in any shareholder lawsuits or  enforcement action by regulators. With little time to investigate the  reasons for the trading problems, it could be hard to assess the risks  before making a deal.
A trader at  Knight, asked if he knew who was responsible for the glitch, said:  "Everyone was like, not to say pointing fingers at each other, but like  'Who's doing this?' kind of atmosphere. รขIt ain't me. I'm on the  program desk. It's not me, I can assure you of that,'" the trader  said.
The top U.S. securities  regulator said government lawyers are trying to determine if Knight  violated a new rule designed to protect the markets from rogue  algorithmic computer trading programs.
The Securities and Exchange Commission's  market access rule requires brokers to put in place risk control systems  to prevent the execution of erroneous trades or orders that exceed  pre-set credit or capital thresholds.
In particular, the SEC said it is looking  at whether the software used by Knight was properly tested before it was  put into use.
Shares of Knight,  the nation's largest retail market maker of U.S. stocks, closed up 57  percent at $4.05 on Friday, still well below their $10.33 closing price  on Tuesday, the day before the trading debacle occurred.
For a market already suspicious that the  system might be fundamentally broken after 2010's "Flash Crash" and the  botched Facebook IPO in May, the troubles at Knight have been another  blow to investor confidence.
Other  Wall Street banks and brokers are poring over their trading systems and  rethinking the way they test software to make sure they don't become the  next Knight.
Executives at the  firms said it was a wake-up call that could prompt them to improve risk  management controls. However, at a time when Wall Street is cutting  costs, spending money on better systems to test software and manage risk  could be an expensive proposition.
"We want to make sure that what happened to  Knight doesn't happen to us," said the head of one investment  bank.
In a letter to clients,  Knight's futures division confirmed that customers' funds for commodity  futures trading accounts "are segregated and kept separate from the  funds of Knight" as required by regulators.
MOVING QUICKLY
Knight's predicament has become all-too  familiar in recent years. During the financial crisis of 2008, several  major financial services firms, including Bear Stearns and Lehman  Brothers, fought for their survival over a weekend. Bear was rescued and  Lehman went under by Monday morning.
More recently, MF Global frantically tried  to find a white knight over a weekend and failed, filing for  bankruptcy.
Knight faces some of  the same challenges in finding a savior over a short period of time. Any  buyer will need the ability to move quickly and put up enough capital to  make sure that Knight remains a reliable counterparty to its trading  partners, financial services bankers and private equity executives  said.
A buyer would also have to  get comfortable with Knight's financials, and perhaps more importantly  its technology, and be sure that the glitch does not happen again, the  bankers and executives said.
One  private equity investor said he suspects that eventually Knight will get  broken up. "Knight has many more businesses than just the equity market  making business. Some are good and some are not," he said. "I'm not sure  who would want them all."
The  company was also in talks with potential buyers, including trading firm  RJ O'Brien, to sell its futures brokerage unit, the New York Times  reported on its website. RJ O'Brien declined to comment.
SOME RESPITE
Knight got some respite on Friday after the  Wall Street Journal reported the company had told brokers it had  obtained a line of credit. A line of credit could address concerns that  have surfaced as to whether Knight has adequate capital to maintain its  trading.
The company would not  confirm that report, however. Sources at other firms said that they had  heard that news only from reporters.
Then several major customers, including  retail brokerages TD Ameritrade and Scottrade, said they had resumed  routing trades to Knight, which in 2011 was the largest U.S. retail  market maker.
"After considerable  review and discussion, we are resuming our order routing relationship  with Knight," TD Ameritrade said in a statement.
Earlier on Friday, mutual fund giant  Vanguard Group said it was still not routing orders through Knight, and  according to people familiar with the situation, Fidelity Investments'  brokerage also was continuing to avoid routing customer orders to  Knight. Knight's trading volumes remained below usual levels on  Friday.
For example, through  Tuesday of this year, Knight accounted for 20 percent of the market  making activity in shares of Apple, one of the most actively traded  stocks on a daily basis. By midday Friday, Knight was the market maker  for just 2 percent of the share volume, according to data from Thomson  Global Markets Autex, though market makers may not be reporting all  trade data.
"A lot of buyside firms  have got us on hold for now," said one Knight trader, who did not give  his name because he is not authorized to speak to the press.
Market makers such as Knight buy and sell  shares for clients and provide liquidity to the equity market by  stepping in to buy and sell to insure orderly, smooth activity. The  trading snafus have revived questions about the integrity of the equity  markets.
'QUIET' ATMOSPHERE AT  KNIGHT
Outside Knight Capital's  Jersey City offices, security warned reporters not to harass employees.  Police officers were also present, and reporters were told to stay off  the company's property.
One  staffer, toting a set of golf clubs, said, "I don't want to care," when  asked how things were going.
Another called the atmosphere at work  "quiet, very quiet."
One trader  said staff had received no announcements from management as yet but  described the atmosphere as "definitely better than yesterday," with  people trying to carry on as usual.
But he noted the company's future remained  in doubt.
"I thought by this  morning we might have heard something. I think a lot of this stuff might  get done over the weekend, maybe Monday the latest," he said.
(Additional reporting by Jed Horowitz,  Jessica Toonkel Rodrigo Campos, Angela  Moon, John  McCrank, Hilary Russ, Greg Roumeliotis and Suzanne Barlyn in New  York, Ann  Saphir in Chicago and Sarah  Lynch in Washington; Writing by David  Gaffen, Ben  Berkowitz and Paritosh  Bansal in New York; Editing by Edward Tobin, Lisa Von Ahn, Steve  Orlofsky, Leslie Adler, Martin  Howell and Carol Bishopric)